Appeals Court Halts SC Transgender Bathroom Rule

A federal appeals court has temporarily blocked a South Carolina budget rule that restricts which bathrooms transgender students can use. The decision comes as part of a lawsuit filed by a transgender student, identified in court papers as “John Doe.”

The rule, known as a budget proviso, prevents schools from using state funds to allow students to use bathrooms that don’t match the sex listed on their birth certificates. Opponents, including the ACLU of South Carolina, argue it’s a form of discrimination and violates federal law.

The student’s lawsuit claims the proviso caused him emotional distress and humiliation. He was reportedly forced to use a separate, single-stall restroom, which he found isolating. A lower court initially denied a request to stop the rule, but the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has now reversed that decision. The appeals court stated that the student is likely to win his case and that enforcing the rule would cause him significant harm.

The court’s order is temporary, and the case will now return to the lower court for further consideration.

The ruling has drawn strong reactions. Supporters of transgender rights celebrated the decision, calling it a crucial step toward protecting students. Conversely, those who back the proviso expressed disappointment, arguing it’s a necessary measure to protect student privacy.

The outcome of this case could set a precedent for similar situations across the country. As the legal proceedings continue, schools and families in South Carolina will be closely watching the final resolution.